Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

THORChain Opens Refund Portal After $10M Hack

9 minutes ago

The Anarchists Who Thought Mao Was on Their Side

35 minutes ago

Sharplink CEO Points out 3 Catalysts for Ethereum’s Price to Surge Higher

1 hour ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Saturday, May 16
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Media & Culture»$500K Damages for False Report of Assault to Police
Media & Culture

$500K Damages for False Report of Assault to Police

News RoomBy News Room3 hours agoNo Comments4 Mins Read557 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

From Bisogno v. Libertella, decided two months ago by the New York Appellate Division, Justices Francesca E. Connolly, Paul Wooten, Helen Voutsinas, and James P. McCormack:

On May 9, 2013, the plaintiff and the defendants appeared for a hearing in the Family Court, Richmond County, relating to a child support proceeding between the defendant John Libertella (hereinafter John) and his former wife. The plaintiff, a lawyer, appeared on behalf of his sister-in-law, John’s former wife. John was accompanied by his father, the defendant Giovanni Libertella. As the parties left the hearing, they were involved in a verbal altercation, which John video-recorded on his phone. The defendants told a court officer that the plaintiff punched John in the face and that John wanted the police called. The police were called, and the plaintiff was arrested.

In November 2013, the District Attorney’s office dismissed the charges against the plaintiff. Multiple news outlets reported on the altercation and the plaintiff’s subsequent arrest.

The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants asserting, inter alia, causes of action sounding in defamation per se, false arrest, and malicious prosecution. After a trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against both defendants on the cause of action alleging defamation per se and against John on the causes of action alleging false arrest and malicious prosecution….

The court upheld the finding of liability:

[B]ased on the evidence adduced by the plaintiff at trial, there was a valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences from which the jury could have concluded that the statements made by the defendants were defamatory per se, because they falsely accused the plaintiff of a serious crime, attempted assault….

“To be held liable for false arrest, a [civilian] defendant must have affirmatively induced the officer to act, such as taking an active part in the arrest and procuring it to be made or showing active, officious and undue zeal, to the point where the officer is not acting of his or her own volition.” “[O]ne who wrongfully accuses another of criminal conduct and induces or procures that person’s arrest may be liable for false arrest.”

In order to recover damages for malicious prosecution, a plaintiff must establish “that a criminal proceeding was commenced; that it was terminated in favor of the accused; that it lacked probable cause; and that the proceeding was brought out of actual malice.” “A civilian defendant who merely provides information to law enforcement authorities, who are free to exercise their own independent judgment as to whether to make an arrest and file criminal charges, will not be held liable for false arrest or malicious prosecution.” “[T]o be held liable for malicious prosecution, it must be shown that the defendant played an active role in the prosecution, such as giving advice and encouragement or importuning the authorities to act.” “Merely giving false information to the authorities does not constitute initiation of the proceeding without an additional allegation or showing that, at the time the information was provided, the defendant knew it to be false, yet still gave it to the police or the District Attorney.”

Here, the record demonstrated that the plaintiff would not have been arrested but for the defendants’ false statements that the plaintiff had punched John, as well as John’s statements importuning the police to arrest the plaintiff. John instigated the arrest, making the police his agents in confining the plaintiff, based upon false information that the plaintiff had assaulted him. Furthermore, the criminal proceeding was instituted by the District Attorney based upon, among other things, false information given by John.

But the court concluded that the jury’s damages awards ($10M in compensatory damages and $250K in punitives) were excessive, and ordered a new trial unless the plaintiff agreed to reducing the damages to $400K in compensatory damages and $100K in punitives.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

#CivicEngagement #Democracy #FreePress #MediaBias #PublicOpinion
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Media & Culture

The Anarchists Who Thought Mao Was on Their Side

35 minutes ago
Media & Culture

State Prosecutors, Protests, and Politics as Usual?

2 hours ago
Media & Culture

Supreme Court “Shadow Docket” Order Preserves Mifepristone Via Telemedicine–For Now

4 hours ago
Media & Culture

Abortion by Mail

5 hours ago
Media & Culture

The Global War on Free Speech

6 hours ago
Media & Culture

Trump’s ‘Golden Dome’ Estimated To Cost $1.2 Trillion, New Report Reveals

7 hours ago
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

The Anarchists Who Thought Mao Was on Their Side

35 minutes ago

Sharplink CEO Points out 3 Catalysts for Ethereum’s Price to Surge Higher

1 hour ago

State Prosecutors, Protests, and Politics as Usual?

2 hours ago

Strategy’s STRC stock logs record $1.5 billion trading volume, funds 11,707 bitcoin purchase

2 hours ago
Latest Posts

OKX Reportedly Eyes Coinone Stake Amid South Korea Crypto Race

2 hours ago

$500K Damages for False Report of Assault to Police

3 hours ago

Crypto longs lose $500 million as bitcoin slides to $78,000, SOL and XRP down 5%

3 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

THORChain Opens Refund Portal After $10M Hack

9 minutes ago

The Anarchists Who Thought Mao Was on Their Side

35 minutes ago

Sharplink CEO Points out 3 Catalysts for Ethereum’s Price to Surge Higher

1 hour ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.