Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Aave Pitches Two Solutions to Resolve Kelp DAO Hack Dilemma

9 seconds ago

The Quantum Threat Is Coming for Bitcoin and Crypto—Here’s How XRP Ledger Is Preparing

1 minute ago

YouTuber Copyright Struck After Others Layer AI Voiceovers On Video Game Music

39 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Tuesday, April 21
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance»RAVE Token Faces Another 50% Crash Amid Price Manipulation Claims
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

RAVE Token Faces Another 50% Crash Amid Price Manipulation Claims

News RoomBy News Room3 hours agoNo Comments3 Mins Read1,640 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
RAVE Token Faces Another 50% Crash Amid Price Manipulation Claims
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

RavenDAO’s RAVE token lost over 98% of its value over the weekend, and the hourly chart now warns of another massive drop in the coming days.

Key takeaways:

RAVE chart hints at 50%-plus drop next

On the hourly chart, RAVE continues to trade inside a descending channel, with lower highs and lower lows forming between two downward-sloping trend lines.

As of Monday, the spot price was retreating after testing the channel’s upper boundary, a sign that sellers remain active on rallies. If that rejection holds, RAVE could slide toward the channel’s lower trend line in the near term.

RAVE/USD hourly chart. TradingView

A Fibonacci extension drawn from the latest bounce at the lower boundary to the recent pullback from the upper boundary points to the 1.618 extension as the next bearish objective.

That level comes in near $0.30, implying a further 55%–58% decline from current prices in April or by May.

Notably, the same setup correctly anticipated Sunday’s drop toward $0.49, reinforcing the channel’s relevance.

RAVE/USD daily chart. Source: TradingView

Meanwhile, the 20-hour exponential moving average at $0.96 and the 1.0 Fib line at $0.94 continue to cap upside attempts. Unless the bulls reclaim these levels decisively, the broader bias remains tilted to the downside.

Market manipulation claims add to RAVE risks

RAVE’s technical weakness is unfolding alongside mounting allegations of market manipulation, with market watchers comparing it to the LUNA and WAVES pump-and-dumps from 2022.

Onchain investigator ZachXBT described the token’s explosive rally and subsequent collapse as a “blatant” pump-and-dump, allegedly orchestrated across major exchanges including Binance, Bitget and Gate.io.

Source: ZachXBT

He flagged roughly 23 million RAVE tokens (worth around $23 million) moving from a team-linked multisig wallet to Bitget deposit addresses shortly before a 40% flash crash, and has since maintained a $25,000 bounty for whistleblowers.

RaveDAO has denied any involvement.

Related: FOMO, lax rules are fueling the crypto crime supercycle

Still, ZachXBT has doubled down on his claims, arguing that over 90% of the token’s supply may be controlled by insiders, raising concerns about liquidity concentration and price control.

Source: X

A few days ago, RaveDAO revealed plans to sell portions of unlocked tokens to fund operations, marketing and hiring.

The team said it is considering price- or performance-based lock mechanisms to better align incentives, adding that “building a movement requires resources.”