Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Why So Many People Feel Lost

23 minutes ago

Prediction markets get first U.S. rule proposal as CFTC pursues contract reviews

44 minutes ago

Pyth Launches 24/7 Pricing Indices for Stocks and Commodities

48 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Wednesday, June 10
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Media & Culture»Hungary Breaks Free: How Voters Ended 16 Years of Orbán’s Iron Rule
Media & Culture

Hungary Breaks Free: How Voters Ended 16 Years of Orbán’s Iron Rule

News RoomBy News Room2 months agoNo Comments8 Mins Read385 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Hungary Breaks Free: How Voters Ended 16 Years of Orbán’s Iron Rule
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Sunday night in Budapest was glorious. The overwhelming majority of Hungarians in the country’s biggest-ever election chucked out a corrupt and oppressive regime that had transformed a once-thriving post-communist country into a listening post for Moscow and Beijing.

I flew in Sunday morning hoping to witness the second great Hungarian liberation of my lifetime. Back in the late 1980s, I had been active in Hungary and other Central/Eastern European countries, working with the classical liberal Carl Menger Institute out of nearby Vienna to identify and assist people looking to escape what turned out to be the final days of Soviet-bloc tyranny. 

Through that work I got to know many founders of Fidesz, then known as the Fiatal Demokraták Szövetsége, or the Federation of Democratic Youth (the acronym Fidesz is Latin for trust). We organized projects with the college where Fidesz was born, the Rajk László Szakkollégium, from intensive seminars on translations of F. A. Hayek’s works to summer schools. 

But what had started out as an exciting youth movement for freedom was converted into a nationalist and illiberal political party, eventually degenerating into a corrupt and statist tool for the personal enrichment of its leaders, particularly Viktor Orbán.

Orbán, who exploded on the scene in June 1989 with a speech in Budapest’s Heroes’ Square demanding the withdrawal of Soviet troops, became Fidesz president in 1993, intentionally shucking off the party’s cosmopolitan past in favor of a more populist nationalism. He forged an alliance with the conservative Hungarian Democratic Forum (MDF) and the Independent Smallholders’ Party (FKGP), but then, after becoming prime minister for the first time in 1998, aggressively poached the voting bases of his two coalition partners, annihilating them as political forces. No alternating center-left/center-right coalitions for Orbán; he wanted Fidesz to have it all.

Orbán lost to the Socialists in 2002, but four years later, Socialist Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsány doomed his party by letting slip at a leaked closed-door party event that, “We have obviously been lying throughout the last one and a half to two years.” The leak eventually led not only to a victory for Fidesz in 2010, but—disastrously—a two-thirds majority in Parliament. This “constitutional majority” allowed Orbán to rewrite laws, overhaul the management and ownership of institutions, and write a new constitution.

Over the ensuing 16 years, Hungary was transformed into an illiberal crony state, falling  further and further behind other post-communist entrants into the European Union. Upon accession into the European Union in 2004, Poland was much poorer than its southern neighbor, as the Hungarian Communists had tolerated a much greater degree of private enterprise during the “goulash communism” of the 1980s. Poland has since pulled well ahead of Hungary, while Romania, which had been far, far poorer than Hungary, has caught up.

A graph showing gross domestic product (GDP) per capita expressed in Purchasing Power Standards, with the E.U. average set at 100 percent, for nine European countries.
Tom Palmer

The chart represents gross domestic product (GDP) per capita expressed in Purchasing Power Standards, with the E.U. average set at 100 percent. The percentages represent what the average citizen of a country could buy with his or her income as a percentage of the average for the European Union as a whole.

Major drivers in Hungary’s dismal performance have been a collapse in private investment, due to cronyism replacing rule of law, as well as the departure of hundreds of thousands of prime-aged Hungarians who prefer setting up businesses, finding work, and managing their affairs without worrying about where they stand with the ruling party.  

Orbán made life worse for his constituents by building what he advertised as “an illiberal state,” in which “no policy-specific debates are needed now.” Since 2015 he has ruled by decree under “permanent emergency” powers. He has for years actively courted the political and economic support of Russia and China. Chinese Communist Party activists patrol the streets of Budapest and in 2024 even forcibly stopped Hungarian opposition party member Márton Tompos as he was hoisting a European Union flag in advance of a Xi Jinping visit. 

Orbán actually defended Chinese police for violently preventing Hungarians from holding free-Tibet signs on the streets of Budapest, saying, “Those who come here as our guests are entitled to be treated as such. So these two rights need to be aligned, so we do not permit activities and events that would diminish our guests’ visit who come to Hungary and are received with respect.” Xi Jinping praised Orbán’s government for its “unequivocal and firm support for China on issues related to Taiwan, Hong Kong, and human rights.” For that, Orbán was richly rewarded with contracts, state investments, and other gifts.

The relationship with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin has been particularly blatant. Orbán declared in February of this year that Ukraine, which Putin continues to mercilessly attack, is an enemy of Hungary. The Orbán regime reportedly even went so far as to prepare false flag operations to blame Ukrainians for election-related violence, including, just days prior, the alleged “discovery” of explosive-laden backpacks near a pipeline in neighboring Serbia. 

Moreover, Orbán and his foreign minister Péter Szijjártó have repeatedly displayed slavish subservience to Putin and his foreign minister Sergey Lavrov, with the former saying to Putin on October 17, 2025, that “In any matter where I can be of assistance, I am at your service,” comparing himself to a mouse offering services to a lion.” Szijjártó, meanwhile, was caught serially calling Lavrov immediately after stepping out of E.U. meetings, and agreeing to provide secret E.U. documents: “I immediately do it. I send it to my embassy in Moscow, and my ambassador will forward it to your chief of staff, and then it’s at your disposal.”

The broadcast and print media are almost completely in the hands of the government or Orbán cronies, thanks to abuse of tax and regulatory powers, denial of licenses, state loans, and the awarding of government advertising contracts on the basis of party allegiance. The voting system had been thoroughly gerrymandered and rigged to favor Fidesz. Subsidies flowed to Fidesz voters, with clear statements from Orbán that they owed him for the support. For the opposition and its supporters, life was made much harder. 

So how did Orbán lose? 

First, despite the rigged system, the intimidation, the gifts, and all of his other tricks, Orbán was widely despised by Hungarians, especially among young people who have known only his corrupt rule and nothing else. The dismal economic performance meant that Hungarians could see that they were falling behind and knew who was responsible for it. 

Second, the opposition leader Péter Magyar, a former member of Fidesz, was a tireless campaigner who walked through the whole of Hungary, visiting villages and speaking directly with ordinary Hungarians. His campaign was expertly run at every level.

Third, the public was prepared for any dirty tricks that Orbán might prepare. Former MP and opposition figure Zoltán Kész sounded the alarm in The Telegraph on March 1: “Hungarians want to kick Viktor Orban out of power. Is he planning a coup to stop them?” Thus ensued a series of revelations about Orbán’s dirty deals and inept attempts at false flag operations.

Fourth, revelations about Orbán’s craven subservience to Xi and Putin undermined his campaign claim that he was protecting Hungarian sovereignty from the European Union (of which Hungary is a member). The dissonance reached absurd levels when U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance beclowned himself by going on a U.S.-taxpayer-funded trip to Hungary to campaign explicitly for Orbán. There Vance stated, with no evidence of understanding the irony, “What has happened in this country, what has happened in the midst of this election campaign is one of the worst examples of foreign election interference that I’ve ever seen or ever even read about.”

Trump added his surreal two cents, writing in his uniquely eloquent style, “Hungary: GET OUT AND VOTE FOR VIKTOR ORBÁN. He is a true friend, fighter, and WINNER, and has my Complete and Total Endorsement for Re-Election as Prime Minister of Hungary — VIKTOR ORBÁN WILL NEVER LET THE GREAT PEOPLE OF HUNGARY DOWN. I AM WITH HIM ALL THE WAY!,” followed the next day by “My Administration stands ready to use the full Economic Might of the United States to strengthen Hungary’s Economy, as we have done for our Great Allies in the past, if Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and the Hungarian People ever need it. We are excited to invest in the future Prosperity that will be generated by Orbán’s continued Leadership!”

In the end, Hungarians stood up and said Szabad Magyarország!, “Free Hungary!” I’m happy beyond the power of words that I was there to witness it. Now begins the process of fulfilling the slogan. Fortunately, many Hungarians are up for the challenge. Freedom advocates in the rest of Europe and the world should stand ready to assist them.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

#FreePress #MediaAccountability #MediaBias #PoliticalDebate #PublicDiscourse
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Media & Culture

Why So Many People Feel Lost

23 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Paradigm, Hyperliquid Policy Center Push Back on GENIUS Act Stablecoin AML Rule

52 minutes ago
Media & Culture

‘CBS news is on fire’

1 hour ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Solana Sponsors the World Series of Poker, Enabling Crypto Entry Fees and Payouts

2 hours ago
Media & Culture

Supreme Court Surprisingly Backs FCC Effort To Punish AT&T, Verizon For Spying On Public Location Data

2 hours ago
Media & Culture

Illinois Just Adopted a Half-Baked Scheme to Tax Social Media

2 hours ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Prediction markets get first U.S. rule proposal as CFTC pursues contract reviews

44 minutes ago

Pyth Launches 24/7 Pricing Indices for Stocks and Commodities

48 minutes ago

Paradigm, Hyperliquid Policy Center Push Back on GENIUS Act Stablecoin AML Rule

52 minutes ago

‘CBS news is on fire’

1 hour ago
Latest Posts

Hungary’s Sziget festival is known as a safe place to express yourself freely. Photo: Sandor Csudai/www.facebook.com/csudaisandor This article first appeared in the Spring 2026 issue of Index on Censorship, The monster unleashed: How Hungary’s illiberal vision is seducing the Western world published on 2 April 2026. Crossing Budapest’s brutalist K-Bridge across the Danube to Óbuda Island on a grey spring day feels like the last journey of a condemned prisoner. The steel truss bridge was built as a temporary measure in 1955, a year before the uprising in which university students and ordinary citizens took to the streets to protest against the Stalinist government of Mátyás Rákosi. The single set of railway tracks suggests a one-way journey. It was built to give access to Budapest’s great Ganz Danubius shipyard. The shipyard was finally closed in 2000, after years of decline. These days, the bridge acts more like a rabbit hole from Orbán’s Hungary into Wonderland. Every summer, hundreds of thousands of people young and old cross to the leafy island to be entertained by music, theatre and dance, and to be challenged by debate, art and film – the joyous week-long celebration of free expression that is the Sziget Festival. Sziget was born from the ashes of Communism. In 1993, four years after the fall of the Iron Curtain, Károly Gerendai was just 22. Thin and sporting a shock of long hair like a Hungarian David Gilmour, Gerendai had become interested in the music industry whilst in high school. As a student, he earned money fly-posting and as a tour manager. Later, he managed bands and worked for record labels. That year, he was in charge of Sziámi, one of the best-known alt-rock bands in the Hungarian underground scene. On the tour bus after a concert, he fell into conversation with Péter Müller, the band’s frontman. “We talked about how, after the political transition, the big youth events had disappeared,” Gerendai told Index. “Before the political transition of 1989–90, there were state-organised youth events, but we quickly realised that they mainly served as a way for the state to control young people. Although we could meet and have fun together, we always felt the state’s watchful eye on us.” State control extended beyond the audience and on to the stage. “In the music industry, strong state selection was also in place: there were supported, tolerated, and banned bands, so not everyone was allowed to be heard.” This is where the seed of something new was born. Post Iron Curtain Co-founder Károly Gerendai. Photo: Sziget Festival “We thought it would be great to organise a multi-day event where young people could be together – something like a holiday combined with concerts, various cultural programmes, and community activities,” he said. Gerendai and Müller approached Gábor Demszky, mayor of Budapest at the time and first of the post-Communist era, for help. “He supported the concept but told us to organise it ourselves,” Gerendai told Index. “Even though we had no experience with anything like this, we boldly jumped into the organisation.” This make-it-up-as-you-go-along approach was typical in post-Soviet eastern Europe. The mayor suggested three possible venues for the festival, one of which was Óbuda Island. The island punctuates the Danube like a giant green exclamation mark between the city’s two halves, Buda and Pest. “Two iconic music events had previously been held there, both attracting huge interest,” said Gerendai. “One was the 1980 Black Sheep concert, a rare occasion when both tolerated and banned bands were allowed to perform. Then in 1991, it was one of the venues for the ‘Goodbye, Ivan!’ event celebrating the withdrawal of Soviet troops. I had worked on that event, which is how I got to know the subcontractors we later invited to help organise our festival.” Hungary’s youth were ready for a party. After only a few months’ preparation, the festival – initially called Diáksziget, Student Island in Hungarian – attracted 43,000 visitors over seven days. “We organised the first festival with the slogan ‘We need a week together’, referring to a carefree, shared community experience. Another slogan was ‘Everything is allowed, but nothing is mandatory’, which was meant to help us leave the past behind, celebrate freedom in every sense, and express that we never again wanted to live in a dictatorship,” said Gerendai. A wobbly start The line-up for the first festival was largely made up of Hungarian artists, such as alt-rock band Kispál és a Borz, punk band Tankcsapda, and singer János Bródy. In all, 200 bands performed on the festival’s two stages, alongside open-air movies and theatre productions. Yet, as was often the case after the fall of Communism, things didn’t work out as planned. Despite receiving sponsorship from Pepsi, the country’s Nagykanizsa brewery, and some support from the city of Budapest, the festival lost money. Lots of it. “It didn’t go smoothly,” admitted Gerendai. “We faced numerous problems during the process and made serious financial miscalculations.” By the end of the festival, it had run up a huge deficit, and only survived thanks to a bailout by the city council. But after this first turbulent year, Sziget not only survived but thrived. The following year saw the number of festivalgoers – or Szitizens as they are usually known – increase to 143,000. International acts like Jethro Tull, The Birds, and Jefferson Starship started to appear on the line-up. “Sziget outgrew Hungary’s borders early on, and we consciously developed the programme lineup, services, and visual identity so that we would be seen as a unique festival on the international scene as well,” said Gerendai. A beacon of light Chappell Roan on stage at Sziget. Photo: Sziget Festival By 2019, the festival was attracting more than half a million visitors to the Hungarian capital every year. The festival’s reputation was such that it was bringing in some of the world’s biggest music acts, including Arctic Monkeys, Kendrick Lamar, Kings of Leon, P!nk, Rihanna, Muse and David Guetta. Óbuda Island has remained the home of the festival. “It’s a great location: close to downtown Budapest, yet also a green, nature-filled area. It’s also symbolic – an island surrounded by a river, where once you cross the bridge, you can leave everyday problems behind,” Gerendai told Index. “It’s the origin of the nickname given by visitors: the Island of Freedom.” This nickname comes from the festival’s commitment to allowing artists and festival goers to speak their views – and was easy to pull off in a liberal city like Budapest keen to attract to hordes of young foreign tourists to boost the economy. In Gerendai’s opinion, freedom of expression was one of the major achievements of Hungary’s political transition in the 1990s. “I believe freedom of expression is a broader concept than simply who we agree or disagree with; it’s not fundamentally our role to judge other people’s views. At Sziget, we have always provided space for differences of opinion and we respect artistic freedom of expression on stage as well. At the same time, we do set limits: we do not allow hate-inciting or human-dignity violating expressions, and we also do not give space to extremist productions whose audiences could potentially endanger the safety of festival visitors.” As well as music, the festival is a thriving forum for circus, street theatre, film, visual arts and cabaret. At the heart of the festival is an area called Think for Tomorrow. The zone addresses pressing social issues that have an impact on the lives of young people, from their own perspective. “NGOs and organisations that play an important role in social and cultural life have also had their own dedicated space at Sziget since the early days,” said Gerendai. “These groups are worth introducing to the festival audience, and their work aligns with Sziget’s core values, such as sustainability, the protection of human rights, and acceptance.” Stepping back Magic Mirror at Sziget. Photo: Kristóf Hölvényi /Rockstar Photographers www.instagram.com/kristofholvenyi/ Eight years ago, after running 25 Sziget festivals, Gerendai decided to step back and sell his interest in the festival to promoter Superstruct, owned by American private equity company KKR. “I decided to pass the baton and from then on followed the festival only as a guest,” he said. During his time at its helm, the values of the Sziget festival had grown increasingly at odds with those of Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz government. There is a huge LGBTQ+ presence at Sziget, both in visitors and artists, with the Magic Mirror venue on the site hosting themed content exploring the LGBTQ+ experience. After the Orbán government introduced anti-LGBTQ+ legislation in 2021, the festival’s new organisers came under pressure over its stance, and there were calls for them to ban under-18s from Magic Mirror. The organisers refused. Sziget’s audience has made itself heard on [former Hungarian prime minister] Orbán over the past few years. At the 2023 festival, during Hungarian rapper Krúbi’s performance the audience started chanting Mocskos Fidesz (Filthy Fidesz). This chant has since become popular common at the festival and at other music events. The Kneecap ban Friction between the festival and Orbán burst into the open in 2025 after Irish rappers Kneecap, who were due to perform at the festival that summer, were banned from the country for being a national security threat. Kneecap are outspoken critics of right-wing political ideology and are particularly scathing about the Israel-Gaza War. Kneecap (along with Bob Vylan) had performed inflammatory sets at Glastonbury the month before and Orbán, for his part, has been strengthening his strategic alliance with Israel, going so far as to declare that “Jewish communities are safer in Budapest than anywhere else in Europe”. Orbán told state broadcaster Kossuth Radio that he was angry that the band had been invited to play at Sziget. He claimed that the organisers’ decision was motivated by financial gain. “Is this damn money really that important?” Orbán asked the radio presenter. Even though they were unable to perform, Kneecap shared a message with festivalgoers gathering at the stage on which they were due to perform. The message read: “We wish we could be there with you at one of the best festivals in the world and the first European festival Kneecap ever played,” the message read. “We can’t because of one hate filled man. Viktor Orbán.” When this part of the message was displayed, a huge crowd who had been told on social media to expect something from the band started booing and chanting “Fuck Orbán”. The message continued: “We have been convicted of zero crimes in any country ever. But we will call out oppression. For calling out Israel’s genocidal campaign Viktor has banned us from your beautiful country for three years. Israel is committing a genocide against the Palestinian people. Viktor Orbán and his government support it. Viktor Orbán and his government tried to shut down Pride in Budapest. They failed. We must stand together. Oppose Orbán. Oppose Israel. Oppose genocide.” The festival’s robust stance in favour of LGBTQ+ rights has won it the European Festival Awards Take a Stand prize twice, in 2023 and 2026 (for 2025). The award recognises festivals that stand up for peaceful dialogue, humanism, tolerance, and mutual understanding – activities that do not necessarily chime with the profit imperative. Stepping forward again It is true, though, that since the Covid pandemic money has been a big problem for the Sziget festival. Like many other European music festivals, Sziget had struggled thanks to two years of cancellations, the spiralling cost of living, and sharply rising artist fees. The festival lost $5.6 million in 2023, and almost $12 million in 2024. In 2025, the company running the festival (without Gerendai) sent a letter to Budapest mayor Gergely Karácsony calling for the agreement between the festival and the city, as the island’s landowner, to be terminated. The festival seemed to be doomed. But the return of a familiar figure saved it at the last minute – its co-founder, Gerendai. “The new owner decided that they no longer wished to finance the festival, which had found itself in a difficult situation in the post-pandemic years due to economic conditions and, in my view, certain conceptual decisions as well,” said Gerendai. “They offered that if I took Sziget back, we could continue organising it under my leadership. So it was either I return – or there would be no Sziget.” “It caused me several sleepless nights, since in the meantime I had been working on completely different things,” Gerendai told Index. “But in the end, I felt that a festival that has become a cultural institution in Hungary and is also significant on the international scene simply cannot end abruptly. Besides, this is my child – I couldn’t abandon it.” Superstruct has come under huge pressure from activists and artists since its acquisition by KKR in June 2024. KKR has significant investments in Israeli companies, including some operating in the West Bank. In May 2025, a number of artists pulled out of the UK’s Field Day festival because of its Superstruct ownership. The transfer of the licence from Superstruct back to Gerendai almost didn’t happen. Budapest City Council initially blocked the transfer, with councillors from Fidesz and Péter Magyar’s opposition Tisza party abstaining from the vote. However, Hungary’s Index newspaper reports that Magyar, reacting to negative sentiment from potential voters over the news that Sziget might fold, quickly arranged a meeting with Gerendai. On 30 October, Magyar posted a picture of himself and Gerendai on Facebook, announcing that the pair would meet again at the 2026 festival after agreeing on two amendments to the proposals: first, that the costs of using the island would be paid back to the city by 2030 rather than 2035, and second, that all Hungarians under the age of 25 would get discounted tickets to the festival – a potential vote-winner among this demographic. Gerendai himself won’t be drawn on his politics. The 2026 Sziget festival is now set to go ahead from 11 to 15 August 2026, featuring Florence + The Machine, Lewis Capaldi, Sombr, Twenty One Pilots, Biffy Clyro and Underworld as well as hundreds of others including Hungarian rapper Sisi on the line-up. Gerendai said, “Many large music festivals operate primarily as business ventures focused on who is performing. In recent years, Sziget had also started to move in this direction, but I believe a festival should stand for more than that. Cultural diversity must be emphasised, as well as a commitment to core values. Reaffirming this ambition can be the key to long-term success – and this is what we aim for in the future.” The future for music festivals remains uncertain but, for now, the legendary island of freedom looks safe back in Gerendai’s hands. READ MORE

2 hours ago

CoinDesk 20 index drops 1.4% as all constituents decline

2 hours ago

Equipment Finance Platform Trad.Fi to Bring $650M in Private Credit Onchain

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Why So Many People Feel Lost

23 minutes ago

Prediction markets get first U.S. rule proposal as CFTC pursues contract reviews

44 minutes ago

Pyth Launches 24/7 Pricing Indices for Stocks and Commodities

48 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.