Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

ADA news: Cardano tapped by Brazil’s state oil giant to track cleaner jet fuel and diesel

3 minutes ago

Singapore Crypto Economy Reaches $284B on Institutional Growth

4 minutes ago

CFTC Investigating Adam Kinzinger Over Kalshi Bets on His Own Pardon: Report

5 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Wednesday, September 30
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»CPJ condemns Trump administration’s intimidation tactics over US war coverage 
Global Free Speech

CPJ condemns Trump administration’s intimidation tactics over US war coverage 

News RoomBy News Room7 months agoNo Comments4 Mins Read2 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
CPJ condemns Trump administration’s intimidation tactics over US war coverage 
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Washington, D.C., March 18, 2026— The Trump administration’s efforts to intimidate news outlets over their coverage of U.S. military action in the Middle East directly threatens the public’s right to know, the Committee to Protect Journalists said Wednesday.

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman Brendan Carr warned in a post on X that “broadcasters that are running hoaxes and news distortions… have a chance now to correct course before their license renewal comes up” and in a post on Truth Social, U.S. President Donald Trump said “fake news” media should be considered to be committing treason. They are the latest in a long line of actions that CPJ has warned are undermining the ability of Americans to access accurate information.

“Restricting what media can report and how is the hallmark of an authoritarian government,” said CPJ CEO Jodie Ginsberg. “The United States is rightly proud of its protections for press freedom. These protections exist not to protect journalists or governments but to protect the public’s right to know. Statements from this administration meant to intimidate the press into silence create a harmful chilling effect that stymies the free flow of information.”

Ginsberg added: “The US Department of Defense has a nearly $1 trillion budget — making it one of the biggest spenders of public money. It’s crucial that journalists be allowed to cover how that money is being spent and what decisions are being made in the name of the American people.” 

A report by respected democracy watchdog the V-Dem Institute concluded this week that the United States is no longer a democracy, stating that “the third wave of autocratization” has spread to the United States, and noted that freedom of expression in the United States had fallen to its lowest level since the end of WWII. It said the decline was driven by a range of documented attacks from censorship and financial coercion to legal intimidation and suppression. “Freedom of expression is at the core of democracy and therefore is the most common target among autocratizing leaders over the past 25 years,” the report’s authors noted.

Trump and Carr’s statements over the war are the latest in the administration’s attempts to coerce the media, through threats of license revocation, spurious lawsuits, or limits to media access. Last year, the Trump administration implemented new Pentagon credentialing policies that most media outlets refused to sign onto because they would severely restrict their freedom to report. Last week, photographers were barred from press briefings with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth because his staff reportedly found the images of him to be “unflattering.”

The statement from Carr on license revocation follows a series of threats from the head of the FCC, which has authority over broadcasters. It does not regulate cable or streaming news, and licenses belong to individual stations, not parent networks like ABC. Revoking a broadcast license on the basis of editorial content would be unheard of, and revocations are rare.

The current U.S. administration is not the first in recent years to seek to control how the media covers the war. Following the U.S. invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan during the Bush administration, journalists, most notably those with foreign outlets, faced increased restrictions and access, and CPJ’s report on the Obama White House found that the administration’s war on leaks and other efforts to control information as the “most aggressive…since the Nixon administration.”  

However, as noted in the V-Dem report, “the scale and speed of autocratization under the Trump administration are unprecedented in modern times.” 

Attempts to censor war coverage put the United States on a par with several other countries that are trying to control what their media reports on the Iran war. During this conflict CPJ has documented press freedom violations in Iran, Israel and the occupied Palestinian territory (IoPT), Jordan, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Oman, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, and Bahrain in relation to coverage of the conflict. 

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

Turkey arrests 2 more journalists as authorities ramp up use of disinformation law to silence the press

1 day ago
Global Free Speech

Iran sentences two journalists as media crackdown widens

2 days ago
Global Free Speech

Northern Ireland: 25 years after journalist Martin O’Hagan was murdered, CPJ and Amnesty call for new investigation

2 days ago
Global Free Speech

Ahead of trial, CPJ, partners demand release of detained photojournalist Hamdi al-Zaeem

4 days ago
Global Free Speech

Journalist Henry Constantín detained in Cuba on ‘disobedience’ charge

5 days ago
Global Free Speech

The BBC clearly sees the value of television series That Mitchell and Webb Look. Marking the 20th anniversary of its original screening, the Beeb has re-released the series on iPlayer. But – and there is very often a “but” with these things – they’ve removed around 11 sketches from the BAFTA award-winning show. The official word is that these sketches don’t “work today”, which is polite speak for “they may cause offence”. The episodes singled out include scenes featuring a battle reenactment with characters in blackface, a contestant on a show wearing a burka and a lost tribe” in a garden centre. These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them; but 20 years on, this distinction seems to have been lost along the way. I’m a bit uncomfortable about this. I find it infantilising, to say the least. Can’t we trust audiences to make up their own minds, to switch off if they find the sketches in question unpalatable? Does the BBC think that we are just passive consumers, unable to disaggregate the mocking of racism from racism itself? These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them This act of censorship is distorting – of the shows, whose narratives and rhythms were built to include these sketches, and more broadly too. Conversations we were having 20 years ago have been erased, as if to suggest that they never happened. But they did! And with this erasure, the opportunity for thoughtful engagement and learning from our past is gone. “Let’s just pretend we were all lovely 20 years ago. It’s better that way” seems to be the message. Speaking as a minority myself, I find that knowing the nasty stuff that people said before – and indeed, still say today – is much more useful than pretending it never happened. This approach, I think, is also inconsistent. What it reveals is a cherry-picking (intended or not) of the groups that we can mock, and those that we can’t. Let’s face it, gender stereotypes are rarely deemed to have aged beyond the pale – if that were the case, we would have to wave goodbye to half the television made before the mid-2010s. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists, namely that what they’re creating today may hold less value tomorrow. Or, even worse, that future audiences may deem them bigots – that Sword of Damocles hovering over the heads of any creative paying attention to the discourse of the moment. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists The BBC’s decision reaffirms a broader trend. In 2020, Little Britain was removed from the iPlayer platform for similar reasons. It has since been reinstated – minus some sketches. Meanwhile, the UK’s arts space more broadly is seeing a retreat to the land of “safe”, as Index recently revealed in a year-long investigation into self-censorship in UK theatre. The BBC, it must be said, does remarkable stuff. The ongoing podcast investigation into the disappearance of US journalist Austin Tice is just one example. But this does not mean, however, that they don’t sometimes get it wrong. Chopping at That Mitchell and Webb Look is one example. Sure, the removal of the material isn’t the life-or-death story that Index often works on. Sure, Mitchell and Webb aren’t the faces of persecuted artists – they have huge platforms and agreed to the changes themselves. Still, one can’t help but think that the decision came from a place of conservatism, perhaps even fear. This is weak and dispiriting, indeed the very opposite of what enables creativity in the arts. We shouldn’t be encouraging this cultural timidity. Rather, we should harness culture and creativity as the starting points of a conversation about our here and now. That’s what the arts are for, after all. READ MORE

5 days ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Singapore Crypto Economy Reaches $284B on Institutional Growth

4 minutes ago

CFTC Investigating Adam Kinzinger Over Kalshi Bets on His Own Pardon: Report

5 minutes ago

No Sealing of Property Information in Motion Challenging Diversity Jurisdiction

43 minutes ago

Just 17% of BTC’s daily price moves are explained by Dollar Index: Crypto Daily

1 hour ago
Latest Posts

FCA Opens UK Crypto Authorization Window for 2027 Regime

1 hour ago

Morning Minute: Robinhood Adds Perps, Weekend Stocks, and AI Traders

1 hour ago

Filing Taxes Will Cost Americans $544 Billion This Year

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

ADA news: Cardano tapped by Brazil’s state oil giant to track cleaner jet fuel and diesel

3 minutes ago

Singapore Crypto Economy Reaches $284B on Institutional Growth

4 minutes ago

CFTC Investigating Adam Kinzinger Over Kalshi Bets on His Own Pardon: Report

5 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.