Listen to the article
In brief
Generally Intelligent Newsletter
A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.
Read the full article here
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.
Europe’s competition regulator has opened a formal investigation into tech giant Meta over policy changes that allow the company’s own AI chatbot to operate on WhatsApp while blocking rivals from doing the same.
The European Commission announced Thursday it’s examining whether Meta violated antitrust rules by effectively reserving WhatsApp’s AI chatbot access for itself.
The action targets updated business terms WhatsApp rolled out in late October, which ban third-party AI companies from distributing chatbots through the messaging app when AI is their core offering.
Under the updated WhatsApp Business Solution Terms, AI providers are “strictly prohibited” from using the business API when AI technologies are “the primary (rather than incidental or ancillary) functionality being made available for use.”
“The Commission is concerned that such new policy may prevent third-party AI providers from offering their services through WhatsApp in the European Economic Area,” the statement reads.
The policy takes effect January 15, 2026, for existing AI providers already on the platform, while new AI providers have been blocked since October 15.
Businesses can still use AI for backend support, like automated customer service responses, according to the policy.
Decrypt has reached out to Meta for further comment.
“In EU antitrust law, the Commission does not need to prove that Meta intended to exclude competitors—only that the policy is capable of producing exclusionary effects,” Ishita Sharma, managing partner at Fathom Legal, told Decrypt.
If proven, Meta’s actions would violate Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement—both prohibit companies from abusing dominant market positions.
Violations under those provisions can include limiting markets to harm consumers or applying different conditions to equivalent transactions that disadvantage competitors.
“The key legal question is whether Meta’s policy materially reduces rivals’ ability to compete on AI-enabled services,” she added, noting that if so, the Commission can establish “an abuse of dominance regardless of whether Meta argues security, safety, or product-integration justifications.”
The probe excludes Italy, where the country’s competition authority is already pursuing separate proceedings against Meta over the same conduct.
The commission said it will prioritize the case but noted that opening formal proceedings “does not prejudge its outcome.”
A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.
Read the full article here
Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.
Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis
You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!
Already have an account? Sign in here
The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.
We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.
Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
