Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Trump’s Iowa Steel Mill Is a Win for Steelmakers. What About Everyone Else?

40 minutes ago

Crypto for Advisors: The CLARITY Act failed, but the rules came anyway

56 minutes ago

NEAR Intents Hit By $3.8M Exploit In Latest Crypto Platform Hack

57 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Thursday, October 1
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»Amid the loss of war, this media center stands by Gaza’s free press
Global Free Speech

Amid the loss of war, this media center stands by Gaza’s free press

News RoomBy News Room11 months agoNo Comments8 Mins Read2 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Amid the loss of war, this media center stands by Gaza’s free press
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

For years, Bilal Jadallah was the quiet force defending independent journalism in the Gaza Strip — a mentor, protector, and the architect of rare safe spaces for Palestinian journalists working under constant threat. When he was killed in an Israeli strike on November 19, 2023, early on in the latest Israel-Gaza war, the loss reverberated far beyond Press House–Palestine, a media center he led as director general since its founding in 2013.

Today, scattered across Gaza and working under the extraordinary strain of what human rights groups and UN experts agree is a genocide, his colleagues are trying to continue the work of an organisation that was essential to providing safety equipment, training programs, legal aid and documenting violations against journalists in the territory.

In this interview, Hekmat Yosuf, the organization’s new director, spoke to CPJ about the legacy of Jadallah, a former CPJ collaborator, and how the institution is striving to adapt amid the devastation of war.

This interview has been translated from Arabic and edited for length and clarity.

Bilal Jadallah, accompanied by a delegation from the European Union, tours a photo exhibition organized by Press House. (Photo: Courtesy of Hekmat Yosuf)

Who was Bilal Jadallah, and what is his legacy in Palestinian journalism?

Bilal Jadallah was more than a Palestinian journalist. He was a courageous voice striving to build a professional, independent media environment in a complex, besieged reality. A reserved person, but deeply influential nonetheless, he believed journalism wasn’t just a profession but an ethical duty.

His legacy is a generation of young journalists whom he supported by empowering them with modern tools and continuous training. He transformed Press House – Palestine into a safe space for expression and media production, blending professionalism, protection and education. He played a key role in documenting violations against journalists and raised his voice locally and internationally to defend their right to work without fear.

What distinguished his approach was his commitment to everyone’s right to expression, regardless of political affiliation. He offered independent spaces free from political control or censorship and insisted that press freedom is part of human dignity, not a privilege.

He lives on in the journalists he trained, the institution he built, and the belief that truth can’t be silenced by bombs. After his death, I felt a deep responsibility to keep his vision alive: defending journalists, freedom of  expression, and youth empowerment. Every documented story is a way to fight erasure and injustice. Rebuilding this institution is about protecting something greater than us: the Palestinian voice.

Bilal Jadallah visits media outlets during a visit to Morocco.
Bilal Jadallah visits media outlets during a visit to Morocco. (Photo: Courtesy of Hekmat Yosuf)

What does Press House – Palestine represent for journalists in Gaza? Before the war, what role did it play for both local and foreign journalists?

To journalists in Gaza before October 7, 2023, Press House – Palestine was more than just a professional headquarters. It was a sanctuary — a rare space for free expression and independent journalism amid enormous political, security and humanitarian pressures.

The institution was among the first to offer practical training in photography, written journalism, television production and mobile journalism, particularly for young media graduates and emerging reporters. It provided free workspaces, editing facilities and meeting rooms, and welcomed journalists from all political backgrounds without discrimination.

Its staff monitored violations against journalists and offered legal and moral support. It also provided safety equipment, including helmets and protective vests.

For foreign journalists covering Gaza, it offered reliable field information, facilitated connections with local reporters and provided logistical support that contributed to safer working conditions. It also organised press briefings and media events to highlight violations of journalists’ rights and everyday life under siege.

Over the course of the war, what happened to the media centre and its team? 

Press House – Palestine was not spared from the ravages of the Israeli assault on Gaza. Like many civil society organizations, its offices faced repeated bombardment and communication and electricity outages. Our staff confronted severe restrictions on movement, limiting their fieldwork, and we lost three key team members, including Bilal Jadallah.

On the morning of October 7, 2023, we immediately organized shifts to maintain 24/7 operations, ensuring uninterrupted electricity and high-speed internet for journalists despite rapidly deteriorating conditions. Bilal instructed our colleagues to prepare safety gear — body armor and helmets clearly marked “Press” — to distribute to journalists who lacked protection.

We continued operating from the Gaza City office until October 13, when Israeli forces ordered evacuations. I live in al-Nuseirat in central Gaza, so I returned home and coordinated operations from there, while some colleagues remained at the office under bombardment.

On November 19, 2023, Bilal Jadallah was assassinated. His death brought immense sorrow. Bilal was not merely a director but a father figure. No one imagined such a thing could happen, given how cautious he was. His assassination was felt as a direct assault on press freedom in Gaza.

The team faced a leadership vacuum and it was deeply traumatic. Urgent decision-making became even more difficult. Many programs — including training, field initiatives, and outreach — had to be paused or scaled back. We also had to reassure partners and donors that Press House – Palestine  would survive. We responded by restructuring into a smaller leadership group, adopting more flexible, decentralized decision-making.

Journalists work in the courtyard outside the Press House headquarters during the last war.
Journalists work in the courtyard outside the Press House headquarters during the last war. (Photo: Courtesy of Hekmat Yosuf)

What work has Press House – Palestine been able to continue during the fighting?

Despite all of this, we continued to offer temporary safe spaces, provide logistical and technical support, and maintain contact with international press freedom and media organizations to amplify Palestinian journalists’ voices.

Our independent news arm, Sawa News, has remained active 24/7. We established a temporary journalist camp in Deir al-Balah, in central Gaza, which  has provided electricity, high-speed internet, and safer working conditions so journalists can carry on with their work. We have also provided psychological, social, and legal support to over 200 Palestinian journalists to help them continue in the profession and build their emotional resilience.

And with a fragile ceasefire in place, what are its plans going forward?

We’re entering a sensitive phase. We aim to resume psychological, legal, and social support for journalists. Training workshops and professional development will gradually restart. We’re strengthening mobile and field journalism, coordinating with donors, and working to rehabilitate our premises and restore operations. Flexibility, staff protection, and mission continuity are at the heart of our strategy. We’ve learned a lot about resilience, and we are applying those lessons to move forward.

Our rebuilding plan includes assessing damage, securing a safe temporary workspace, restoring archives and our media library, and designing more resilient digital systems. We are working to replace lost cameras, computers, and technical gear as funding allows. We’re also resuming training for students and graduates and maintaining donor relationships. Our goal is not only to restore the physical space, but to build a stronger, more adaptable institution.

Hekmat Yousef, the new director of Press House, gives a lecture on the media to students and graduates in the Gaza Strip.
Hekmat Yousef, the new director of Press House, gives a lecture on the media to students and graduates in the Gaza Strip. (Photo: Courtesy of Hekmat Yosuf)

How do you view the role of independent media in Gaza now, and how has the war reshaped journalism for Palestinians?

The war has changed everything. Journalism has become even more dangerous, with direct targeting of reporters and institutions. Communication blackouts, infrastructure damage, and siege conditions make newsgathering a life-threatening activity. Journalists constantly have to balance professional standards with personal safety. In Palestine, journalism is no longer just reporting — it is resistance, documentation, and survival.

Methods have also evolved. Journalists now rely more on mobile phones, digital platforms, and security tools. They constantly balance professional standards with personal safety. The public has turned more and more to independent media for trustworthy information.

Sawa News Agency staff report on the latest developments of the Israeli incursion.
Sawa News Agency staff report on the latest developments of the Israeli incursion. (Photo: Courtesy of Hekmat Yosuf)

What would you like the world to know about what the organization and independent media in Gaza needs today?

Journalists here are not just covering news — they are witnessing history, documenting abuses, and preserving memory. They face bombings, arrests, movement restrictions, and the destruction of infrastructure. But they continue, with courage and commitment. Their role is vital — they deserve protection and recognition.

We need concrete support, not just statements of solidarity. Press House – Palestine  requires help to rebuild its physical premises, replace equipment, and restore digital infrastructure. We need reliable power, internet, and emergency communication tools. 

Journalists need psychological, legal, and financial support — including fast legal aid when detained or harassed. People need to understand that institutions like Press House – Palestine  are essential to preserving press freedom and democracy in Palestine. Supporting them is an investment in truth.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

CPJ urges Morocco to end press surveillance following Amnesty report 

2 hours ago
Global Free Speech

          As news broke that 84,270 people, including more than 32,000 children, had been affected by Nepal’s catastrophic floods, one visual offered something the world desperately needed in the moment: hope. The video shows a little girl, buried under thick mud, being is rescued by Nepal’s emergency teams. Instinctively, the viewer roots for her as rescuers carry her to safety, wrapping her shivering body in a red shawl. But the most moving moment of the video comes towards the end. The girl is sitting motionless in a relief camp, an officer feeding her warm soup. As the camera lingers on her face, a faint smile almost begins to show. It is the kind of image that can offer the viewer respite from the horrors of a humanitarian crisis. The video rapidly spread rapidly across all social media platforms, with commentators calling it a miracle. Of sorts. In fact, it was an AI miracle. Agence France-Presse (AFP) Fact Check’s investigation led them to an India-based creator, who admitted creating the video with the help of AI-generative tools. His justification was disarmingly straightforward: emotionally engaging visuals perform well online. This was just one of the many digitally-manufactured “miracles” put into social media heavy rotation during the floods. Another clip, showing a bridge collapsing into floodwaters swallowing vehicles and human lives, seemed to have been lifted straight out of a Roland Emmerich disaster film. The video racked up more than 2 million views on X before it was debunked as AI-generated by Factly. What made this social media post stand out for me was the identity of one of the people sharing it – an experienced news editor. The post, still pinned on his X profile and with more than 2 million views, suggests that even experienced newsroom decision-makers could be fooled by synthetic disaster footage – or, worse still, be untroubled about the veracity of such videos. Both videos incorporate the visual language of short films, but were not released in cinemas or on Netflix. They surfaced on Facebook, X and Instagram, even as emergency teams continued to search for the thousands of people that went missing after a glacial collapse triggered devastating floods in Nepal and Tibet on August 26. Even as survivors photographed authentic eyewitness footage, synthetic visuals emerged alongside them. The floods became one of the first major climate disasters in South Asia where documentation and fabrication coexisted in the same visual ecosystem.     Screenshot of debunked Nepal floods footage “During earlier disasters, our primary challenge was identifying old footage, establishing where a video was recorded and determining whether it was being presented in the correct context,” Saurabh Shukla told Index. Shukla is founder and editor-in-chief of NewsMobile, an India-based independent media organisation that debunks AI-related deepfakes and focuses on verified information. “The biggest difference today is the sheer speed at which fabricated and misleading visuals entered the information ecosystem,” Shukla said. “With generative AI, we now have an additional challenge – determining whether the event depicted in a video ever happened in the first place.” This has fed into a media environment where unverified visuals are disseminated faster than the verified facts reported by journalists. “Speed without verification can amplify confusion, while verification without timely reporting can leave an information vacuum,” Shukla said. “The challenge for newsrooms is to strike the right balance between being fast and being accurate.” The first images of rescue missions in secluded mountainous regions almost always come from locals, and thus forming the spine of disaster reporting. These inevitably blurry and shaky recordings do not have the polished quality of professional news reporting, but do carry something far more consequential: the credibility that comes with eyewitness documentation. These images often shape the core of the collective memory of a tragedy. But in an age of visual manipulation and trickery, that presumption of authenticity no longer holds. Factly conducted 30 fact-checks into coverage of the Nepal floods; fully one-third involved AI-generated visuals. “Beyond checking the location, source, and context of a visual, we also had to establish whether the visual itself was authentic,” Akshay Kumar Appani, lead fact checker and researcher at Factly, told Index. “During breaking disasters, old AI-generated visuals can spread rapidly while being presented as current footage. This makes it harder for journalists to establish the truth. The visual of the miracle child perfectly captured this dilemma. It was designed to evoke an emotional reaction; but it also looked like the kind of footage that journalists hope to find during crisis reporting. The video was vertically filmed. The camera movement was wobbly. The lighting was grainy. The muffled background sound felt believable. The video presented none of the glaring distortions that once made AI interventions easy to spot. Fabricated videos, today, can be produced to mimic the aesthetics of authentic citizen journalism. It was for this precise reason that the floods presented journalists with a crisis that went beyond recognising AI-generated images: they were increasingly obliged to verify whether the footage reaching them was genuine in the first place. Screenshot of video debunked by Factly Newsmobile’s verification process increasingly involves examining individual frames, conducting reverse-image searches, analysing visual inconsistencies and using AI-detection tools where appropriate. “However, detection tools are only one part of the process. We still need corroboration,” Shukla said. “We cannot rely solely on automated detection tools,” Sumit Dubey, South Asia digital verification editor for AFP’s Fact Check vertical, told Index. Fact-checking, he explained, requires going beyond automated outputs: tracing the original source, examining context, verifying metadata, looking for corroborating evidence and, where possible, speaking to relevant sources. “Automated tools are useful indicators, but fact-checking cannot be outsourced to a button,” Dubey said. The proliferation of synthetic media output in the wake of natural disasters is not new. It’s the sophistication of the output that has changed. For years, much of the public conversation around AI manipulation centred on faces: celebrity deepfakes, altered political speeches and fabricated portraits. The Nepal floods flipped that narrative. Almost every fabricated clip featured rivers, glaciers, collapsing hillsides, dams, flooded valleys or stranded animals. “AI-generated environmental content poses a different problem: [the] tells are failures of physics rather than anatomy,” Mahsa Alimardani told Index. Alimardani is associate director for technology threats and opportunities at Witness, a global organisation helping people use video and technology to protect and defend human rights This explains why the Nepal videos were so plausible. The miracle girl video wasn’t believable just because of her facial expressions. It was convincing because the sludge moved convincingly, because the choreography resembled actual emergency rescues, because the emotional tonality seemed genuine. “Most post-hoc detection tools were designed for content featuring physical characteristics, and they currently struggle significantly with environmental and disaster content,” Bruna Martins dos Santos – policy and advocacy manager, Witness Technology Threats and Opportunities – told Index. “Journalists might also struggle because many tools have limited capabilities to identify synthetic content generated elsewhere,” she said. Another emerging trend is the increasingly complicated role of Big Tech itself in detecting and labelling fake generative-AI content. Some of the clearest AI verdicts came from detection tools built by the very same companies whose models created the same fakes. Three weeks after the US state of California and the EU mandated the requirement for greater transparency with respect to AI-generated content, Witness and Indicator tested thirteen major AI providers. They found that seven had no public detector at all. “The capability to identify synthetic content partly existed. The governance around it did not,” Alimardani said. When both authentic and synthetic content circulate in disaster situations, the biggest challenge that journalists face is that of establishing truth amidst widespread public uncertainty and doubt. According to Martins dos Santos, “Journalists and local fact-checkers can face immense time pressure, often wasting scarce resources re-detecting the same recycled disaster footage across multiple platforms and languages.” The greatest danger emerging from Nepal may not be that people believed the fake videos. It may be that they have begun to doubt the real ones. Shukla’s concern is that people may stop trusting visual evidence altogether. “Imagine a situation where genuine footage of a disaster emerges, but people dismiss it as AI-generated. Facts become secondary to perception.” Within days of the floods, even authentic CCTV footage from the Gyirong border was being perceived as AI-generated, prompting fact-checkers to establish that the scenes it depicted were real. This exposed a troubling issue: even authentic visuals can no longer be taken at face value. Martins dos Santos told Index that the phenomenon has a name: “Liar’s dividend”, whereby the mere existence of convincing synthetic content allows bad actors to dismiss genuine, damaging evidence as fake simply by claiming it was AI-generated. This means that genuine footage is no longer accorded credibility immediately; it may first be perceived with suspicion. “This means a video may look completely authentic and still be fabricated. Conversely, genuine footage can contain compression artefacts that make it appear suspicious,” Shukla warned. Appani, for his part, noted that synthetic media doesn’t merely affect verification in real time. It also reshapes collective memory. “Widely circulated synthetic or recycled footage may eventually be remembered as genuine imagery from the disaster. Generative-AI could therefore affect not only how disasters are verified in real-time, but also how they are documented and remembered in the future.”The Nepal floods left destruction in its wake, and also a warning for journalists covering climatic disaster. The defining challenge of disaster reporting is no longer capturing the first image, but establishing which image the world can trust. In Shukla’s words: “For fact-checkers, the challenge is not just determining whether a video is real. It is establishing whether it actually belongs to the event it claims to depict.” READ MORE

3 hours ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ, partners call on Malta to ensure broad consultation on draft media reform bill 

5 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Hong Kong journalist Tang Ho-wing arrested in latest sedition case

21 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Taliban shut down 3rd Shiite-centered media outlet in 4 months in Afghanistan

23 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Iran sentences 2 journalists as media crackdown widens

1 day ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Crypto for Advisors: The CLARITY Act failed, but the rules came anyway

56 minutes ago

NEAR Intents Hit By $3.8M Exploit In Latest Crypto Platform Hack

57 minutes ago

Near Intents Hacked for $3.8M Days After Denying North Korea-Linked Bitget Hacker

58 minutes ago

Jewish Community Center’s Lawsuit Against “Goyim Defense League” Can Go Forward

2 hours ago
Latest Posts

CPJ urges Morocco to end press surveillance following Amnesty report 

2 hours ago

NEAR Intents hit by $3.8M exploit, pauses cross-chain services in latest crypto hack

2 hours ago

Stablecoins Can Drain From Banks And Nations At Lightning Speed

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Trump’s Iowa Steel Mill Is a Win for Steelmakers. What About Everyone Else?

40 minutes ago

Crypto for Advisors: The CLARITY Act failed, but the rules came anyway

56 minutes ago

NEAR Intents Hit By $3.8M Exploit In Latest Crypto Platform Hack

57 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.