Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Cuban journalist forced to flee island to Brazil following threats by state agents

6 minutes ago

Another Trump memecoin dinner advertised for token’s top investors

11 minutes ago

European Crypto Advocates Challenge MiCA Stablecoin Rules

12 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Thursday, October 1
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»Palestinian journalists targeted with Ramadan bans, arrests at Al-Aqsa holy site
Global Free Speech

Palestinian journalists targeted with Ramadan bans, arrests at Al-Aqsa holy site

News RoomBy News Room11 months agoNo Comments6 Mins Read3 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Palestinian journalists targeted with Ramadan bans, arrests at Al-Aqsa holy site
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Nazareth, November 4, 2025—Israeli police banned at least 10 Palestinian journalists from Jerusalem’s disputed Al-Aqsa Mosque compound during Ramadan this year, CPJ has found, in what many view as a deliberate effort to censor coverage of the holy site.

Intimidatory tactics against the press have increased in the two years since the start of the Israel-Gaza war, journalists and human rights experts told CPJ, with police summoning journalists for questioning, alleging that they posed security risks or could incite riots. 

Al-Aqsa has long been a sensitive flashpoint. Israel has restricted Palestinians’ access in recent years, while visits from right-wing Israeli politicians, like security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, have inflamed tensions. 

Located in Jerusalem’s Old City, Al-Aqsa is Islam’s third holiest site and part of a compound also sacred to Jews, who call it the Temple Mount. Israel captured East Jerusalem, including the Old City, from Jordan in 1967 and later annexed it, in a move widely not recognised internationally. 

“The bans on journalists have always existed, but they became more frequent and aggressive under the current far-right government — and turned into a nightmare after October 7, 2023,” a person working with the Islamic Waqf in Jerusalem, the Jordanian-run body that manages the Al-Aqsa compound, told CPJ on condition of anonymity, citing fear of reprisals.

“Since then, even ordinary people filming on their phones risk arrest, expulsion, or assault. The police want full control over the image from Al-Aqsa — to appear as if they alone are in charge.”

‘Police do not disclose any evidence’’

Women pray next to the Dome of the Rock Mosque in the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound during Ramadan on March 28, 2025. (Photo: AP/Mahmoud Illean)

In interviews with CPJ, the 10 journalists confirmed that they were banned during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, which began on February 28. The true figure is likely higher, as many journalists fear speaking out could trigger renewed bans. Half of the bans were subsequently extended. 

Freelance journalist Mohammed Sadiq, 47, received his first ban of the year during Ramadan, followed on September 11 by a one-week ban, which was renewed on September 25 for four months until January 2026.

“They said my presence could cause riots, but I only carry a camera for documentation,” said Sadiq, highlighting that he has no criminal record. “These decisions directly affect my work. They not only prevent me from entering Al-Aqsa, but also from approaching the streets of the Old City, which effectively means emptying the area of journalists.”

Another Jerusalem journalist, who asked to remain anonymous, told CPJ that he was banned for six days on March 10, and again on September 9. CPJ reviewed copies of the ban orders.

“I explained I’ve been a journalist for more than 10 years, that I’m a member of the Israeli Journalists Syndicate and the International Federation, and that I pose no threat … but they said my presence could threaten public order,” he said.

Most of the journalists received a summons by phone or a visit to their home to go to a police station and sign an order acknowledging they had been banned from Al-Aqsa. They said they were entitled to a hearing but, in reality, they were often questioned at length, without explanation as to why they had been summoned.

“The police do not disclose any evidence in their possession,” Nir Guntag, who monitors such violations for the Union of Journalists in Israel, told CPJ. “Out of fear and exhaustion, journalists usually sign just to end the ordeal.”

“We estimate that there are dozens of similar cases every year, and the majority of those subjected to them are Arab journalists. This is a grave violation of press freedom,” Guntag added.

Crescent medics assist an injured journalist amid clashes between Israeli security forces and Palestinians at the Al-Aqsa Mosque complex in 2022.
Palestinian Red Crescent medics assist an injured journalist amid clashes between Israeli security forces and Palestinians at the Al-Aqsa Mosque complex in 2022. (Photo: AFP/Ahmad Gharabli)

Other journalists shared similar ordeals:

  • Photographer Mohammed Qarout Edkaidek told CPJ that he received a one-week ban on March 1, which was extended to one month. He said his equipment had been confiscated repeatedly. 
  • On March 2, Bassem Zidani, 38, who contributes to Lebanon-based TV channel Al-Mayadeen and Turkish-state owned broadcaster TRT, was informed by phone that he was banned from Al-Aqsa for a week, the freelance journalist told CPJ. At the Old City’s Al-Qishla police station the next day, police cited a “secret file” that alleged his presence would “cause trouble.” Zidani returned on March 9, only to be handed a three-month ban “without any right to object.” 
  • Freelance photographer Mohammed Abu Sneineh, 20, told CPJ that he was detained while entering Al-Aqsa Mosque on March 2 and banned until March 9. The ban was then extended for four months on the grounds that there was a risk of him “inciting riots through filming,” he said. 
  • Freelance journalist Nadine Jaafar, 22, told CPJ that she was banned for a week on March 4. On April 11, she was arrested inside Al-Aqsa and banned for another week. 
  • Freelance photographer Mohammed Dweik, 32, told CPJ that he was banned on March 17 for two months for “security reasons.” 
  • Freelance journalist Latifa Abdel Latif told CPJ that she was arrested on March 16 and banned on March 19 for one week.
  • Freelance photographer Wahbi Mekki, 40, told CPJ he was banned for six months on March 19 after accusations of posing “a threat” and supporting “Hamas terrorism.” 
  • Saif Qawasmi, 24, a freelance photographer for Al Jazeera Mubasher, was issued with a four-month ban on March 28. He told CPJ that he had been banned six times in five years. 
Israeli police officers escort lawmaker Itamar Ben-Gvir, center, and a group of Jewish men as they visit the Temple Mount, known to Muslims as the Noble Sanctuary, on the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in the Old City of Jerusalem, during the annual mourning ritual of Tisha B'Av (the ninth of Av) a day of fasting and a memorial day, commemorating the destruction of ancient Jerusalem temples, Sunday, Aug. 7, 2022.
Israeli police officers escort ultranationalist lawmaker Itamar Ben-Gvir (center) and a group of Jewish men as they visit the Temple Mount, known to Muslims as the Noble Sanctuary, on the Al-Aqsa compound in 2022. (Photo: AP/ Mahmoud Illean)

“The police don’t want media coverage of their actions, so it’s no surprise that harassment of Palestinian journalists inside Al-Aqsa is increasing,” Aviv Tatarsky, a researcher with Ir Amim, a nonprofit that promotes equality for Palestinians and Israelis in Jerusalem, told CPJ. 

“These restrictions intensify ahead of Jewish holidays, as the police prefer right-wing presence in Al-Aqsa to go undocumented. And it’s even clearer that such practices have escalated since October 7,” he added, referring to visits by politicians.

Israeli police confirmed to CPJ via messaging app that they had issued “a number of exclusion orders” but declined to provide further information.

The exclusions are not confined to Ramadan.

On November 2, freelance journalist Majdi al-Abbasi was banned from Al-Aqsa for one week — a restriction that can be extended for four to six months — after being arrested while filming Friday prayers on October 31. 

The journalist was taken to Jerusalem’s Qishleh police station where his phone was confiscated and he was questioned for more than two hours about “disturbing public order” and “obstructing police work,” his brother Mahdi al-Abbasi told CPJ.

Majdi al-Abbasi is due to return to the police station on November 9 to hear whether the ban will be extended. 

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

Cuban journalist forced to flee island to Brazil following threats by state agents

6 minutes ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ urges Morocco to end press surveillance following Amnesty report 

4 hours ago
Global Free Speech

          As news broke that 84,270 people, including more than 32,000 children, had been affected by Nepal’s catastrophic floods, one visual offered something the world desperately needed in the moment: hope. The video shows a little girl, buried under thick mud, being is rescued by Nepal’s emergency teams. Instinctively, the viewer roots for her as rescuers carry her to safety, wrapping her shivering body in a red shawl. But the most moving moment of the video comes towards the end. The girl is sitting motionless in a relief camp, an officer feeding her warm soup. As the camera lingers on her face, a faint smile almost begins to show. It is the kind of image that can offer the viewer respite from the horrors of a humanitarian crisis. The video rapidly spread rapidly across all social media platforms, with commentators calling it a miracle. Of sorts. In fact, it was an AI miracle. Agence France-Presse (AFP) Fact Check’s investigation led them to an India-based creator, who admitted creating the video with the help of AI-generative tools. His justification was disarmingly straightforward: emotionally engaging visuals perform well online. This was just one of the many digitally-manufactured “miracles” put into social media heavy rotation during the floods. Another clip, showing a bridge collapsing into floodwaters swallowing vehicles and human lives, seemed to have been lifted straight out of a Roland Emmerich disaster film. The video racked up more than 2 million views on X before it was debunked as AI-generated by Factly. What made this social media post stand out for me was the identity of one of the people sharing it – an experienced news editor. The post, still pinned on his X profile and with more than 2 million views, suggests that even experienced newsroom decision-makers could be fooled by synthetic disaster footage – or, worse still, be untroubled about the veracity of such videos. Both videos incorporate the visual language of short films, but were not released in cinemas or on Netflix. They surfaced on Facebook, X and Instagram, even as emergency teams continued to search for the thousands of people that went missing after a glacial collapse triggered devastating floods in Nepal and Tibet on August 26. Even as survivors photographed authentic eyewitness footage, synthetic visuals emerged alongside them. The floods became one of the first major climate disasters in South Asia where documentation and fabrication coexisted in the same visual ecosystem.     Screenshot of debunked Nepal floods footage “During earlier disasters, our primary challenge was identifying old footage, establishing where a video was recorded and determining whether it was being presented in the correct context,” Saurabh Shukla told Index. Shukla is founder and editor-in-chief of NewsMobile, an India-based independent media organisation that debunks AI-related deepfakes and focuses on verified information. “The biggest difference today is the sheer speed at which fabricated and misleading visuals entered the information ecosystem,” Shukla said. “With generative AI, we now have an additional challenge – determining whether the event depicted in a video ever happened in the first place.” This has fed into a media environment where unverified visuals are disseminated faster than the verified facts reported by journalists. “Speed without verification can amplify confusion, while verification without timely reporting can leave an information vacuum,” Shukla said. “The challenge for newsrooms is to strike the right balance between being fast and being accurate.” The first images of rescue missions in secluded mountainous regions almost always come from locals, and thus forming the spine of disaster reporting. These inevitably blurry and shaky recordings do not have the polished quality of professional news reporting, but do carry something far more consequential: the credibility that comes with eyewitness documentation. These images often shape the core of the collective memory of a tragedy. But in an age of visual manipulation and trickery, that presumption of authenticity no longer holds. Factly conducted 30 fact-checks into coverage of the Nepal floods; fully one-third involved AI-generated visuals. “Beyond checking the location, source, and context of a visual, we also had to establish whether the visual itself was authentic,” Akshay Kumar Appani, lead fact checker and researcher at Factly, told Index. “During breaking disasters, old AI-generated visuals can spread rapidly while being presented as current footage. This makes it harder for journalists to establish the truth. The visual of the miracle child perfectly captured this dilemma. It was designed to evoke an emotional reaction; but it also looked like the kind of footage that journalists hope to find during crisis reporting. The video was vertically filmed. The camera movement was wobbly. The lighting was grainy. The muffled background sound felt believable. The video presented none of the glaring distortions that once made AI interventions easy to spot. Fabricated videos, today, can be produced to mimic the aesthetics of authentic citizen journalism. It was for this precise reason that the floods presented journalists with a crisis that went beyond recognising AI-generated images: they were increasingly obliged to verify whether the footage reaching them was genuine in the first place. Screenshot of video debunked by Factly Newsmobile’s verification process increasingly involves examining individual frames, conducting reverse-image searches, analysing visual inconsistencies and using AI-detection tools where appropriate. “However, detection tools are only one part of the process. We still need corroboration,” Shukla said. “We cannot rely solely on automated detection tools,” Sumit Dubey, South Asia digital verification editor for AFP’s Fact Check vertical, told Index. Fact-checking, he explained, requires going beyond automated outputs: tracing the original source, examining context, verifying metadata, looking for corroborating evidence and, where possible, speaking to relevant sources. “Automated tools are useful indicators, but fact-checking cannot be outsourced to a button,” Dubey said. The proliferation of synthetic media output in the wake of natural disasters is not new. It’s the sophistication of the output that has changed. For years, much of the public conversation around AI manipulation centred on faces: celebrity deepfakes, altered political speeches and fabricated portraits. The Nepal floods flipped that narrative. Almost every fabricated clip featured rivers, glaciers, collapsing hillsides, dams, flooded valleys or stranded animals. “AI-generated environmental content poses a different problem: [the] tells are failures of physics rather than anatomy,” Mahsa Alimardani told Index. Alimardani is associate director for technology threats and opportunities at Witness, a global organisation helping people use video and technology to protect and defend human rights This explains why the Nepal videos were so plausible. The miracle girl video wasn’t believable just because of her facial expressions. It was convincing because the sludge moved convincingly, because the choreography resembled actual emergency rescues, because the emotional tonality seemed genuine. “Most post-hoc detection tools were designed for content featuring physical characteristics, and they currently struggle significantly with environmental and disaster content,” Bruna Martins dos Santos – policy and advocacy manager, Witness Technology Threats and Opportunities – told Index. “Journalists might also struggle because many tools have limited capabilities to identify synthetic content generated elsewhere,” she said. Another emerging trend is the increasingly complicated role of Big Tech itself in detecting and labelling fake generative-AI content. Some of the clearest AI verdicts came from detection tools built by the very same companies whose models created the same fakes. Three weeks after the US state of California and the EU mandated the requirement for greater transparency with respect to AI-generated content, Witness and Indicator tested thirteen major AI providers. They found that seven had no public detector at all. “The capability to identify synthetic content partly existed. The governance around it did not,” Alimardani said. When both authentic and synthetic content circulate in disaster situations, the biggest challenge that journalists face is that of establishing truth amidst widespread public uncertainty and doubt. According to Martins dos Santos, “Journalists and local fact-checkers can face immense time pressure, often wasting scarce resources re-detecting the same recycled disaster footage across multiple platforms and languages.” The greatest danger emerging from Nepal may not be that people believed the fake videos. It may be that they have begun to doubt the real ones. Shukla’s concern is that people may stop trusting visual evidence altogether. “Imagine a situation where genuine footage of a disaster emerges, but people dismiss it as AI-generated. Facts become secondary to perception.” Within days of the floods, even authentic CCTV footage from the Gyirong border was being perceived as AI-generated, prompting fact-checkers to establish that the scenes it depicted were real. This exposed a troubling issue: even authentic visuals can no longer be taken at face value. Martins dos Santos told Index that the phenomenon has a name: “Liar’s dividend”, whereby the mere existence of convincing synthetic content allows bad actors to dismiss genuine, damaging evidence as fake simply by claiming it was AI-generated. This means that genuine footage is no longer accorded credibility immediately; it may first be perceived with suspicion. “This means a video may look completely authentic and still be fabricated. Conversely, genuine footage can contain compression artefacts that make it appear suspicious,” Shukla warned. Appani, for his part, noted that synthetic media doesn’t merely affect verification in real time. It also reshapes collective memory. “Widely circulated synthetic or recycled footage may eventually be remembered as genuine imagery from the disaster. Generative-AI could therefore affect not only how disasters are verified in real-time, but also how they are documented and remembered in the future.”The Nepal floods left destruction in its wake, and also a warning for journalists covering climatic disaster. The defining challenge of disaster reporting is no longer capturing the first image, but establishing which image the world can trust. In Shukla’s words: “For fact-checkers, the challenge is not just determining whether a video is real. It is establishing whether it actually belongs to the event it claims to depict.” READ MORE

5 hours ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ, partners call on Malta to ensure broad consultation on draft media reform bill 

7 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Hong Kong journalist Tang Ho-wing arrested in latest sedition case

24 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Taliban shut down 3rd Shiite-centered media outlet in 4 months in Afghanistan

1 day ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Another Trump memecoin dinner advertised for token’s top investors

11 minutes ago

European Crypto Advocates Challenge MiCA Stablecoin Rules

12 minutes ago

The ‘Largest Pure-Play’ XRP Treasury Is About to Go Public

13 minutes ago

The National Debt Has Exploded. The Reckoning Is Still Coming.

55 minutes ago
Latest Posts

Citigroup raises 12-month bitcoin (BTC) target to $113,000 as ETF inflows resume

1 hour ago

Bitcoin Liquidity Thickens at $84,000 as US Bond Yields Cool

1 hour ago

It’s the Start of Uptober. Will Bitcoin Live Up to It?

1 hour ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Cuban journalist forced to flee island to Brazil following threats by state agents

6 minutes ago

Another Trump memecoin dinner advertised for token’s top investors

11 minutes ago

European Crypto Advocates Challenge MiCA Stablecoin Rules

12 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.